Feedback Request: Traveling Wolves
Posted 2022-10-11 18:07:58
|
Laminae #3502 |
Posted 2022-10-11 18:15:30
|
Whats this game #80066 |
Posted 2022-10-11 18:54:14 (edited)
the only possible issue as see is with pregnant/nested gals i don't think gals that are pregnant should be allowed to be in the role traveler and same goes for nested gals just cause i wouldn't want pups to be born outside my den causing the bio's to be messed up |
πΊπΊπ£ππ²π΅π²π°π±π½πΊπΊ #9486 |
Posted 2022-10-11 19:14:51 (edited)
I also had a few ideas that would probably help to make the feature a litte better and more fleshed out - while not being overly hard to add.
Nonetheless I think I'm with the others saying this should be a low priority. We have features pending from a roadmap released a year ago with no news on them. I'd much rather see those than a feature that pertains to only a portion of the community. |
Lily (GH!) #3016 |
Posted 2022-10-11 19:19:15
|
Scream #9176 |
Posted 2022-10-11 19:37:17
If the owner can recall the Wolf at any time, why would a timer or retirement date be needed? They can just call home the Wolf. I'm asking because I wasn't part of the traveling Wolf groups and it seems like that's covered under the plan already π |
Slothie #2938 |
Posted 2022-10-11 19:40:06
Make it impossible for anyone other than the owner to rename a traveler. It's just common courtesy and makes sense. Yes! Full support for this. A timer set by the traveler's owner for the maximum amount of time a wolf should remain in one host's pack. If this timer is broken the wolf should probably be returned to the owner's den so they can continue their journey. imo, neither of these would be necessary if we had a recall feature. If the owner sees their wolf staying too long, or if they want them returned at a certain age, they can bring them home at any time. Only allow each player to own one traveler. They can host multiple but can only ever own one. I personally do not care for this rule but it was one that existed A bit of background on this one (not for you in particular, just in general): For a while, the traveling wolf community was having issues where people were sending out multiple wolves, but only hosting one, so there were more wolves than available hosts and it was causing problems for everyone. That's where the "one wolf" rule came from. At the time it was implemented, I thought it would be better to have a rule where you always host as many as you have active (e.g., if you have 3 active travelers, you should host 3 outside wolves) but keep it flexible for people who want more travelers. However, that would be an honor system type of thing and not easy to implement in terms of coding. If it's going to be an official role, I wouldn't mind seeing it limited - just as you can only have one herbalist, you can only own one traveler at a time. |
Lionel #34199 |
Posted 2022-10-11 19:42:53
|
peachy #89670 |
Posted 2022-10-11 19:51:03
|
Birb #94618 |
Posted 2022-10-11 19:58:45
Honestly i'd like a max of 4 travelers i can send out and wouldn't mind taking in that number or more. Though this is me and what i'd be okay with.... Maybe it can be similar to how much turf ya got like for hunting parties? |
Fea #12206 |