Skip to main content
Main Content

Marking Opacity During Breeding

Posted 2022-04-30 23:32:53
Honestly, I didn't know that there was the chance for markings not to pass because of low opacity. I usually focus on very high opacity so probably I had it happen less.
But good to know and I'm happy for this change.

Thanks for the clarification and keep up the good work!!

PiffleLovesBaseball
#740

Posted 2022-05-01 01:28:01
I have always believed this was how it worked already, so I'm very glad it is now! My wolves have lots of markings with low opacity.

Thank you for listening to the community!
Eelai
#1355

Posted 2022-05-01 02:08:22 (edited)
I paired up two wolves with the exact same markings in scry (all 10 marks are the same marking). They had different opacities, White Urajiro in slot 10 is high in both wolves but the pups looked like they didn't get that and other marks?

I'm still a little confused, does the scry reflect these changes yet?

EDIT: I think I get it now? So there's still a 25% chance the marking wont roll at all even when the parents have the same one?

Gacheru
#742

Posted 2022-05-01 06:18:52
Oooo awesome!
Viper Rat
#3941

Posted 2022-05-01 07:37:36
News! ABOUT MARKINGS!

🦜 Birbz 🦜
#58077

Posted 2022-05-01 15:36:44
Why not letting us have a way to find out ourselves that low opacity markings were less likely to pass onto pups? You didn't need to be sorry then.

Dżanek
#24018

Posted 2022-05-01 17:29:52
Thank you for this information! I kind of suspected that low opacity markings had a hard time passing, but its nice to know for sure AND also that low opacity markings have a better chance to pass now

Food?
#20022

Posted 2022-05-02 05:43:08
10/10 game, I would recommend adding cool facts of the day and maybe recommend wolf sanctuary around the world to help spread the awareness of wolves!
Alex
#65916

Posted 2022-05-03 11:02:39
No worries! There's no need to be sorry for this. 💕

Orion
#6210

Posted 2022-05-05 14:18:44 (edited)
I wonder if this change majorly affects the gameplay. With old system, if you had 1% marking parent with no marking parent the chance would be just halved so 25% of the marking passing (assuming range is in real numbers and decimal percentage is rounded to the closest whole number). If you look for specific marking, it was a decent chance to have a pup with one, under assumption litter of 3,5 pups is the average with 75% chance of failure per pup you had chance of 0,75^3,5=~0,365 to fail the whole litter meaning you had 63,5% chance to get a pup with desired marking if you had just one parent with the marking of 1% opacity. This is quite a high chance, compared to how bases and eyes are being passed.

Dżanek
#24018